Patient P-02168
Therapy response
Unstable
Tolerance
Improving
GI state
Unstable
Inflammatory state
Stable
Nutritional resilience
Stable
Discontinuation risk
65%
Trajectory
Baseline → today → 30-day prediction · hover a day for signals and eventssolid = observed · dashed = predicted
- Day 0 META-24 started — Baseline state S15
- Day 47 NP-02 recommended — Dietary Support Protocol NP-02
- Day 48 Patient accepted — Started NP-02 in the companion
- Day 58 GI symptom burden −23% vs expected — Dietary Support Protocol NP-02
- Day 64 Tolerance state changed — Unstable → Improving
- Day 71 GI-04 recommended — GI Support Protocol GI-04
- Day 72 Patient accepted — Started GI-04 in the companion
- Day 80 GI symptom burden −27% vs expected — GI Support Protocol GI-04
- Day 86 Tolerance state changed — Unstable → Improving
- Day 88 Trajectory diverged from prediction — Observed response fell below the model's expected path.
- Day 89 ME-01 recommended — Monitoring Escalation ME-01
- Day 90 Patient accepted — Started ME-01 in the companion
- Day 93 Deterioration detected before clinical escalation — Monitoring Escalation ME-01
What changed?
Trajectory began diverging from predicted response on Day 88.
Primary contributors, last 14 days
- GI instability+8
- Toxicity-5
- Treatment adherence+4
What helped?
- Dietary Support Protocol NP-02Day 47Result: symptom burden −23%
- GI Support Protocol GI-04Day 71Result: symptom burden −27%
- Monitoring Escalation ME-01Day 89Result: deterioration detected before clinical escalation
LIFE OS recommendation
Clinician Review CR-01
74%
probability of meaningful tolerance improvement
- 284 similar trajectories
- 100% showed improvement
- median effect visible after 5 days
Biological layers
Which pathways look influenced, and by which layer of this person's biology.
Pathways under pressure
- Mucosal barrier integrity ↓90
- DNAFUT2 non-secretor lowers mucosal fucosylation
- MicrobiomeAkkermansia low → thinner mucus layer
- Daily logGI symptom score 58 and rising
- WearableSleep 6.0 h, below personal baseline
- Inflammatory signalling ↑85
- DNAIL6 -174 variant raises baseline inflammatory tone
- MicrobiomeBacteroides fragilis expansion
- BloodInflammatory load index 49
- WearableHRV 33 ms, trending down
- Butyrate / short-chain fatty acid production ↓80
- MicrobiomeButyrate capacity 33/100
- MicrobiomeF. prausnitzii depleted
- Daily logFibre intake low in recent food logs
- Autonomic recovery ↑45
- WearableResting HR 78 bpm
- WearableShort sleep window
DNA
Fictional pharmacogenomic panel
- FUT2 rs601338 AA (non-secretor)Reduced mucosal fucosylation
- IL6 -174 G/CHigher inflammatory tone
- CYP2D6 Rapid metabolizerExpected exposure
Microbiome
Shannon diversity 2.1 · butyrate capacity 33/100
- Akkermansia muciniphilaLow
- Faecalibacterium prausnitziiLow
- Bacteroides fragilisHigh
- Bifidobacterium longumLow
- EnterobacteriaceaeNormal
Wearable, last 14 days
daily evolution fed into the runtime
- HRV
- 31 ms
- Sleep
- 5.7 h
- Steps
- 6,103
- Resting HR
- 78 bpm
Daily log: GI score 58, nutritional resilience 45, adherence 52.
What this patient sees in NostraAI
The content that steers the trajectory: what to eat, what to do, what to take.
What to eat
- Prepare a plain, low-fat pasta or rice meal and note how it feels afterwards
- Choose a freshly cooked, lean protein; avoid frying, rich sauces and leftovers for now
- Add one soluble-fibre source (oats, cooked carrots, banana) to breakfast
- Eat slowly and stop at comfortable fullness — smaller volume, more often
What to do
- Track each bowel movement today: time, stool form, urgency, overnight waking
- Keep the current walking rhythm
- Protect a 7.5-hour sleep window; screens off 30 minutes before
- Keep hydration steady: small amounts through the day rather than large volumes at once
What to take
- Take the dose at the same time relative to your evening meal
- Electrolyte solution, one sachet after any loose stool
- Fictional demo item: oral nutrition supplement with lunch
284 biologically similar trajectories
Black: this patient. Green: similar patients whose intervention worked. Orange: similar patients where it did not.
| Patient | Similarity | Baseline | Intervention | Outcome | Response today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-02255 | 52% | S14 | GI-04 | improved | 43 |
| P-02018 | 50% | S01 | GI-04 | improved | 46 |
| P-02328 | 50% | S14 | GI-04 | improved | 42 |
| P-02106 | 48% | S14 | GI-04 | improved | 44 |
| P-02108 | 48% | S14 | GI-04 | improved | 43 |
| P-02002 | 47% | S14 | GI-04 | improved | 47 |
| P-02241 | 46% | S09 | GI-04 | improved | 56 |
| P-02401 | 46% | S14 | GI-04 | improved | 49 |
| P-02574 | 46% | S14 | ME-01 | improved | 45 |
| P-02628 | 45% | S14 | SC-12 | improved | 47 |
| P-02132 | 44% | S14 | SC-12 | improved | 40 |
| P-02149 | 43% | S14 | GI-04 | improved | 50 |