Human Model · HM(t) at day 101
State-timeSynthetic demo data⟨ I, St, H0:t, Et, Θt, T, Ut ⟩ — belief, not fact; uncertainty shown, not hiddenSteering view
1
Localization — where is this individual biologically now?
Belief state b_t per dimension: value ± sd from within-person noise plus the observation model's semantic distance. Trajectory features (velocity, autocorrelation, recovery time) are state variables.
| Dimension | b_t | dS/dt | autocorr | recovery | observation model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therapy response | 82 ± 7.2 | +0.01/d | 0.17 | 2 d | Imaging + tumour markers, interpolated · proxy · last read ≤ 14 d |
| Gastrointestinal function | 31 ± 6.3 | -0.23/d | 0.6 | 5 d | Daily GI check-in · direct · today |
| Treatment toxicity | 23 ± 8.9 | +0.67/d | 0.73 | — | Labs, interpolated between draws · proxy · last draw ≤ 7 d |
| Inflammatory activity | 29 ± 11.3 | -0.06/d | 0.28 | 4 d | CRP/ferritin + immune signature · inferred · weeks |
| Immune / metabolic | 72 ± 11 | -0.04/d | -0.27 | 6 d | Metabolic panel + wearable · inferred · weeks |
| Nutritional sufficiency | 62 ± 8.2 | +0.05/d | 0.37 | 3 d | Weight, albumin, food log · proxy · days |
| Adherence | 89 ± 4.1 | -0.12/d | 0.52 | 8 d | Dose + to-do completion · direct · today |
| Function / quality of life | 70 ± 5.3 | +0.04/d | -0.31 | 1 d | PRO items · direct · today |
High autocorrelation and slow recovery are early-warning signatures of a critical transition (Scheffer et al.), independent of the level.
2
Provenance — how did they arrive here?
The path H_0:t: baseline constraints, divergence, perturbations, actions and responses in order.
- day 0baselineBaseline S15: EC-02 phenotype; Intermediate metabolizer; butyrate 64
- day 18divergenceTrajectory diverged from the population model
- day 18noteTrajectory diverged from prediction
- day 30perturbationLow-HRV stretch (-2.7)
- day 68perturbationDietary drift (-2.6)
Now: in the restoration basin, heading towards failing.
3
Mechanism — which theories best explain the trajectory?
Versioned competing theories with supporting (E+), contradicting (E−) and missing-but-discriminative (E?) evidence. The contradiction engine lists what should NOT happen under each theory and whether it did.
T1 v2leading
confidence 47%
Mucosal barrier loss: drug-induced epithelial injury amplified by a FUT2-dependent glycan deficit; histamine and inflammatory load add on top.
E+
- DeepGene: Escherichia coli above range (LPS / zonulin)
E−
- No FUT2 variant
- No histamine signal in the log
E? · would discriminate
- Faecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility)
- Serum DAO / histamine
- Zonulin
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not improve while histamine intake stays high (GI velocity 0.19/day)
✓ holdsLow-residue meals should reduce GI within a week (not tested)
v1 baseline: genotype + phenotype → v3 dietary attribution from 60-day log
T2 v2weakened
confidence 18%
Bile-acid diarrhoea on a low-butyrate ecology: reduced SCFA production leaves bile acids unconjugated after fat-rich meals; GI burden tracks fat intake with a one-day lag.
E+
- —
E−
- Butyrate producers intact
- No fat-load signal in the log
E? · would discriminate
- Faecal bile acids
- 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)
- Rechallenge: 3 high-fat days under observation
Forbidden under this theory
✗ violatedGI should not rise on low-fat days (fat effect -1.1 over 43 low-fat days)
v1 baseline: microbiome → v2 dietary attribution
T3 v1competing
confidence 18%
Drug-exposure toxicity: pharmacokinetic over-exposure drives GI and systemic toxicity together; dietary and microbial factors are secondary.
E+
- —
E−
- Toxicity within range
E? · would discriminate
- Trough drug level
- Dose-timing rechallenge (evening vs morning)
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not move with diet if exposure is the driver (0 dietary detractors with ≥ 80% confidence)
v1 baseline: pharmacogenomics
T4 v1competing
confidence 18%
Behavioural spiral: symptomatic days cut adherence and sleep, which raise GI and stress, which cut adherence further; the biology is a follower, not the driver.
E+
- —
E−
- Adherence intact
- Sleep and stress stable
E? · would discriminate
- Dose-taking timestamps vs symptom timestamps
- Sleep-window rechallenge
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not worsen on days with full adherence and good sleep (insufficient paired days)
v1 from tracker trends
4
Forecast — which futures are likely under alternative actions?
30-day rollout of GI burden under the baseline model T and under each safe candidate action (effect ramps over onset). Dashed = prediction, never fact.
No action
GI 31 → 19
8
Intervention as measurement
Each past action as a measurement of this patient's transition dynamics: predicted ΔGI vs observed, prediction error ε_t, and the within-patient evidence patterns → individualized response confidence (observational, kept separate from randomized evidence).
No action started yet.
5
Decision — the Restore controller
Safe set computed first, then A* = argmax E[HealthGain + λ₁·InformationGain + λ₂·ConfidenceGain − λ₃·Risk − λ₄·Burden − λ₅·Cost]. λ₁ = 0.3 (a theory leads), λ₃ = 1 (stable enough). Execution stays with the clinician or the informed patient (EU MDR Class I).
| Class | Action | Health | Info | Conf. | Risk | Burden | Cost | Utility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observe | Continue passive collection, no perturbation A clean transition can be observed only without a new perturbation. | 0 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.03 |
| Measure | Faecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility) Discriminates T1 from its competitors (E?). | 0 | 0.45 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 0.01 |
| Maintain | Hold current regimen and content Protects nothing while the state deteriorates. | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0 | 0 |
| Test | Serum DAO / histamine Discriminates T1 from its competitors (E?). | 0 | 0.45 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.5 | -0.05 |
Excluded from the safe set
- DT-01 Not indicated for the current state.
- CR-01 Not indicated for the current state.
- GI-04 Not indicated for the current state.
- BR-03 Not indicated for the current state.
- ME-01 Not indicated for the current state.
- HY-01 Not indicated for the current state.
- AD-05 Not indicated for the current state.
- NP-02 Not indicated for the current state.
- SC-12 Not indicated for the current state.
Evidence weights · w = Authority × Relevance × Persistence
- Biological identity Intermediate metabolizer; CYP2D6Germline panel, baseline0.86 (0.95·0.9·1)
- High-authority clinical Toxicity 23, response 82Labs / imaging, ≤ 14 d0.77 (0.9·1·0.85)
- Intervention response 0 within-patient responses recordedΔS after each action, accumulating0.68 (0.75·1·0.9)
- Deep biological state DeepGene retest day 90: damage 32/100, Shannon 3.15, butyrate 791 CPM, 3 opportunists above, 2 keystone absentSynthetic DeepGene metagenomics + host DNA, sample 912874-R (compositional proxy)0.59 (0.7·1·0.845)
- Dynamic state GI 31, sleep 7.9 h, HRV 37Companion + wearable, today0.18 (0.6·1·0.3)
- Exposure context Keep meals regular; three to four moderate portions spaced through the day; dosing per protocol; adherence 89%Food log + dose log, event-level0.1 (0.55·0.9·0.2)
LLIFE OS insight · the five questions, in prose
grounded · add an LLM key for proseP-01677 is on day 101 of NBL-101 (EC-02, baseline S15): response declining, tolerance deteriorating, GI deteriorating. Over 14 days response moved -5 and GI +7; discontinuation risk is 30%. The state is in the restoration basin, heading towards failing, after diverging from the model on day 18.
Butyrate capacity 64/100, diversity 3.9, intermediate metabolizer. Pushing it down: Escherichia coli 9.853% (LPS load) (-23.6), Low-HRV stretch (-2.7), Dietary drift (-2.6). Pulling it up: Butyrate producers intact (+10.8).
No action has been tried yet.
No action is indicated now; the trajectory is stable relative to similar patients.