Patient P-02004
Synthetic patientMETA-24 · Day 125 · 35–44 · F · baseline S08Steering view · 3DOpen companion preview
Therapy response
Favorable
Tolerance
Deteriorating
GI state
Improving
Inflammatory state
Favorable
Nutritional resilience
Improving
Discontinuation risk
10%
Trajectory
Baseline → today → 30-day prediction · hover a day for signals and eventssolid = observed · dashed = predicted
- Day 0 META-24 started — Baseline state S08
What changed?
Trajectory is tracking the baseline prediction.
Primary contributors, last 14 days
- Toxicity+11
- Nutritional resilience+10
- GI instability-9
What helped?
No interventions yet.
LIFE OS recommendation
No intervention is indicated right now. The trajectory is stable relative to similar patients. See what worked for similar patients.
Daily trackers
Molecule settingsThe trackers this program marks as important, last 14 days vs the 14 before.
Active minutes
Wearable90 min
improving · +11.2 vs previous 14 d
Sleep duration
Wearable5.9 h
stable · +0.2 vs previous 14 d
Energy level
Daily log6.9/10
improving · +1.0 vs previous 14 d
Steps
Wearable9,285
improving · +958 vs previous 14 d
GI burden
Companion11.6/100
improving · -15.7 vs previous 14 d
Adherence
Companion91.8 %
stable · -2.3 vs previous 14 d
Sleep quality
Wearable27.7/100
improving · +4.8 vs previous 14 d
Glucose, CGM daily mean
CGM131 mg/dL
improving · -8.0 vs previous 14 d
This trajectory is decaying — what would help, what would not
Steering view →Heading towards restoration · 98 from the failing basin, 12 from restoration.
Would help
- No untried action with strong evidence. Compose one from primitives.
- More proteinGI -7 next day on high-intake days · n 21
Would not help
- Keep ultra-processed lowGI +6.6 next day on high-intake days · n 17
- Keep simple carbs lowGI +3.9 next day on high-intake days · n 18
- Keep caffeine lowGI +3.4 next day on high-intake days · n 16
State influencers · digestive
Next-day GI change on high-intake vs low-intake days, last 60 days. Attribution from this patient's own log; sensitivity set by their biology.
- Protein-7supporter · 95%
- Ultra-processed food+6.6detractor · 95%
- Simple carbohydrates+3.9detractor · 70%
- Caffeine+3.4detractor · 59%
- Dietary fat load+1.6no signal · 30%
- Insoluble fibre-0.5no signal · 15%
- Alcohol+0.5no signal · 15%
- Histamine load+0.1no signal · 15%
Biological layers
Which pathways look influenced, and by which layer of this person's biology.
Pathways under pressure
- Inflammatory signalling ↓20
- MicrobiomeBacteroides fragilis expansion
- Autonomic recovery ↓20
- WearableShort sleep window
- Mucosal barrier integrity ↓10
- WearableSleep 5.9 h, below personal baseline
DNA
Fictional pharmacogenomic panel
- CYP2D6 Rapid metabolizerExpected exposure
Microbiome
Shannon diversity 2.8 · butyrate capacity 59/100
- Akkermansia muciniphilaNormal
- Faecalibacterium prausnitziiNormal
- Bacteroides fragilisHigh
- Bifidobacterium longumLow
- EnterobacteriaceaeHigh
Wearable, last 14 days
daily evolution fed into the runtime
- HRV
- 48 ms
- Sleep
- 6.7 h
- Steps
- 8,994
- Resting HR
- 59 bpm
Daily log: GI score 12, nutritional resilience 71, adherence 92.
What this patient sees in NostraAI
The content that steers the trajectory: what to eat, what to do, what to take.
What to eat
- Keep meals regular; three to four moderate portions spaced through the day
- Include a cooked vegetable portion with each main meal
- Keep fibre steady; no new sources this week
- Eat slowly and stop at comfortable fullness — smaller volume, more often
What to do
- Log the daily check-in; one line is enough
- Keep the current walking rhythm
- Protect a 7.5-hour sleep window; screens off 30 minutes before
- Keep hydration steady: small amounts through the day rather than large volumes at once
What to take
- Take the dose at the same time relative to your evening meal
- No additional supplements this week
- Fictional demo item: continue vitamin D as before
284 biologically similar trajectories
Black: this patient. Green: similar patients whose intervention worked. Orange: similar patients where it did not.
| Patient | Similarity | Baseline | Intervention | Outcome | Response today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-02450 | 48% | S12 | NP-02 | improved | 92 |
| P-02415 | 47% | S17 | GI-04 | improved | 86 |
| P-02667 | 46% | S08 | HY-01 | improved | 77 |
| P-02630 | 45% | S17 | NP-02 | improved | 76 |
| P-02277 | 42% | S05 | AD-05 | improved | 92 |
| P-02486 | 40% | S10 | ME-01 | improved | 86 |
| P-02690 | 39% | S02 | ME-01 | improved | 73 |
| P-02127 | 38% | S11 | SC-12 | improved | 73 |
| P-02249 | 38% | S09 | DT-01 | improved | 100 |
| P-02068 | 36% | S14 | NP-02 | improved | 83 |
| P-02193 | 36% | S11 | CR-01 | improved | 87 |
| P-02464 | 34% | S18 | ME-01 | improved | 68 |