700 patients109,892 observations180 daysLIVE

Human Model · HM(t) at day 141

State-timeSynthetic demo data⟨ I, St, H0:t, Et, Θt, T, Ut ⟩ — belief, not fact; uncertainty shown, not hiddenSteering view
1
Localization — where is this individual biologically now?
Belief state b_t per dimension: value ± sd from within-person noise plus the observation model's semantic distance. Trajectory features (velocity, autocorrelation, recovery time) are state variables.
Dimensionb_tdS/dtautocorrrecoveryobservation model
Therapy response52 ± 9-0.24/d0.469 dImaging + tumour markers, interpolated · proxy · last read ≤ 14 d
Gastrointestinal function10 ± 7.7+0.11/d0.73Daily GI check-in · direct · today
Treatment toxicity15 ± 7.6+0.34/d0.649 dLabs, interpolated between draws · proxy · last draw ≤ 7 d
Inflammatory activity20 ± 11.8+0.16/d0.4510 dCRP/ferritin + immune signature · inferred · weeks
Immune / metabolic57 ± 11.4-0.14/d0.355 dMetabolic panel + wearable · inferred · weeks
Nutritional sufficiency69 ± 9.3-0.13/d0.382 dWeight, albumin, food log · proxy · days
Adherence91 ± 4.4-0.05/d0.542 dDose + to-do completion · direct · today
Function / quality of life68 ± 6.6-0.28/d0.553 dPRO items · direct · today
Glycaemic control121 ± 80/d0CGM daily mean · direct · today

High autocorrelation and slow recovery are early-warning signatures of a critical transition (Scheffer et al.), independent of the level.

2
Provenance — how did they arrive here?
The path H_0:t: baseline constraints, divergence, perturbations, actions and responses in order.
  1. day 0baselineBaseline S06: ET phenotype; Normal metabolizer; butyrate 23
  2. day 12divergenceTrajectory diverged from the population model
  3. day 12noteTrajectory diverged from prediction
  4. day 17perturbationPoor-sleep week (-3)
  5. day 22recommendedGI-04 recommended
  6. day 23acceptedPatient accepted
  7. day 31responseGI symptom burden −26% vs expected
  8. day 37state changeTolerance state changed
  9. day 42perturbationDaily walks resumed (3.3)
  10. day 68perturbationLow-HRV stretch (-2.7)
  11. day 108perturbationDietary drift (-2.6)

Now: between basins, heading towards restoration.

3
Mechanism — which theories best explain the trajectory?
Versioned competing theories with supporting (E+), contradicting (E−) and missing-but-discriminative (E?) evidence. The contradiction engine lists what should NOT happen under each theory and whether it did.
T1 v2leading
confidence 47%

Mucosal barrier loss: drug-induced epithelial injury amplified by a FUT2-dependent glycan deficit; histamine and inflammatory load add on top.

E+
  • FUT2 non-secretor genotype (barrier glycan deficit)
  • DeepGene: Escherichia coli above range (LPS / zonulin)
  • DeepGene: host DNA fragmentation atypical
  • DeepGene: tissue recycling 56
  • GI-04 (barrier-support protocol) improved GI
E−
E? · would discriminate
  • Faecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility)
  • Serum DAO / histamine
  • Zonulin
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not improve while histamine intake stays high (GI velocity 0.07/day)
✓ holdsLow-residue meals should reduce GI within a week (not tested)
v1 baseline: genotype + phenotype → v2 day 23: GI-04 response added to E+
T2 v2competing
confidence 45%

Bile-acid diarrhoea on a low-butyrate ecology: reduced SCFA production leaves bile acids unconjugated after fat-rich meals; GI burden tracks fat intake with a one-day lag.

E+
  • Butyrate capacity 23/100
  • DeepGene: 5 keystone butyrate producers absent
  • DeepGene: H2S above band
  • Fat load → GI +5.7 next day
  • Diversity 2.0
E−
E? · would discriminate
  • Faecal bile acids
  • 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)
  • Rechallenge: 3 high-fat days under observation
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not rise on low-fat days (fat effect 5.7 over 42 low-fat days)
v1 baseline: microbiome → v2 dietary attribution
T4 v1competing
confidence 6%

Behavioural spiral: symptomatic days cut adherence and sleep, which raise GI and stress, which cut adherence further; the biology is a follower, not the driver.

E+
  • Sleep quality worsening
E−
  • Adherence intact
E? · would discriminate
  • Dose-taking timestamps vs symptom timestamps
  • Sleep-window rechallenge
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not worsen on days with full adherence and good sleep (insufficient paired days)
v1 from tracker trends
T3 v1falsified
confidence 1%

Drug-exposure toxicity: pharmacokinetic over-exposure drives GI and systemic toxicity together; dietary and microbial factors are secondary.

E+
  • GI autocorrelation 0.77 (slow recovery)
E−
  • Normal metabolizer
  • Toxicity within range
E? · would discriminate
  • Trough drug level
  • Dose-timing rechallenge (evening vs morning)
Forbidden under this theory
✗ violatedGI should not move with diet if exposure is the driver (3 dietary detractors with ≥ 80% confidence)
v1 baseline: pharmacogenomics
4
Forecast — which futures are likely under alternative actions?
30-day rollout of GI burden under the baseline model T and under each safe candidate action (effect ramps over onset). Dashed = prediction, never fact.
No action
GI 1019
8
Intervention as measurement
Each past action as a measurement of this patient's transition dynamics: predicted ΔGI vs observed, prediction error ε_t, and the within-patient evidence patterns → individualized response confidence (observational, kept separate from randomized evidence).
Actionpred ΔGIobs ΔGIεtemporalitymagnitudedechallengerechallengecross-modalconfidence
GI-04 day 23-23-18+5non/a53%
5
Decision — the Restore controller
Safe set computed first, then A* = argmax E[HealthGain + λ₁·InformationGain + λ₂·ConfidenceGain − λ₃·Risk − λ₄·Burden − λ₅·Cost]. λ₁ = 0.6 (theories near-equiprobable), λ₃ = 1 (stable enough). Execution stays with the clinician or the informed patient (EU MDR Class I).
ClassActionHealthInfoConf.RiskBurdenCostUtility
MeasureFaecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility)
Discriminates T1 from its competitors (E?).
00.750.20.020.250.20.32
TestSerum DAO / histamine
Discriminates T1 from its competitors (E?).
00.750.20.020.250.50.27
ObserveContinue passive collection, no perturbation
A clean transition can be observed only without a new perturbation.
00.150.0500.0500.08
MaintainHold current regimen and content
Protects nothing while the state deteriorates.
0.050.050.050.050.0500.02
Excluded from the safe set
  • DT-01 Not indicated for the current state.
  • HY-01 Not indicated for the current state.
  • GI-04 Not indicated for the current state.
  • BR-03 Not indicated for the current state.
  • SC-12 Not indicated for the current state.
  • ME-01 Not indicated for the current state.
  • AD-05 Not indicated for the current state.
  • NP-02 Not indicated for the current state.
  • CR-01 Not indicated for the current state.
Evidence weights · w = Authority × Relevance × Persistence
  • Biological identity Normal metabolizer; FUT2, CYP2D6, GLP1R
    Germline panel, baseline
    0.86 (0.95·0.9·1)
  • High-authority clinical Toxicity 15, response 52
    Labs / imaging, ≤ 14 d
    0.77 (0.9·1·0.85)
  • Intervention response 1 within-patient responses recorded
    ΔS after each action, accumulating
    0.68 (0.75·1·0.9)
  • Deep biological state DeepGene retest day 90: damage 84/100, Shannon 2.27, butyrate 414 CPM, 3 opportunists above, 5 keystone absent
    Synthetic DeepGene metagenomics + host DNA, sample 936800-R (compositional proxy)
    0.45 (0.7·1·0.645)
  • Dynamic state GI 10, sleep 6.4 h, HRV 47, glucose 121
    Companion + wearable, today
    0.18 (0.6·1·0.3)
  • Exposure context Keep meals regular; three to four moderate portions spaced through the day; dosing per protocol; adherence 91%
    Food log + dose log, event-level
    0.1 (0.55·0.9·0.2)
LLIFE OS insight · the five questions, in prose
grounded · add an LLM key for prose

P-02041 is on day 141 of META-24 (ET, baseline S06): response stable, tolerance favorable, GI improving. Over 14 days response moved +4 and GI -7; discontinuation risk is 8%. The state is between basins, heading towards restoration, after diverging from the model on day 12.

Biology sets the gain: FUT2 non-secretor, Low butyrate capacity, Low microbial diversity; butyrate capacity 23/100, diversity 2.0. Pushing it down: Escherichia coli 25.768% (LPS load) (-42.1), Low butyrate capacity (-33.1), 5 keystone species absent (-24.8). Pulling it up: GI Support Protocol GI-04 (+56.3), Protein (supports) (+27.3). From the daily log: protein -6.6 GI next day, fat +5.7 GI next day, simple carbs +4.9 GI next day, ultra-processed +3.3 GI next day.

Past actions: GI-04 on day 23 → improved (26%).

No action is indicated now; the trajectory is stable relative to similar patients.