Human Model · HM(t) at day 143
State-timeSynthetic demo data⟨ I, St, H0:t, Et, Θt, T, Ut ⟩ — belief, not fact; uncertainty shown, not hiddenSteering view
1
Localization — where is this individual biologically now?
Belief state b_t per dimension: value ± sd from within-person noise plus the observation model's semantic distance. Trajectory features (velocity, autocorrelation, recovery time) are state variables.
| Dimension | b_t | dS/dt | autocorr | recovery | observation model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therapy response | 99 ± 9 | +0.34/d | 0.5 | 1 d | Imaging + tumour markers, interpolated · proxy · last read ≤ 14 d |
| Gastrointestinal function | 13 ± 4.9 | -0.21/d | 0.41 | 1 d | Daily GI check-in · direct · today |
| Treatment toxicity | 9 ± 8.6 | +0.09/d | 0.58 | 2 d | Labs, interpolated between draws · proxy · last draw ≤ 7 d |
| Inflammatory activity | 19 ± 11.5 | -0.11/d | -0.08 | 2 d | CRP/ferritin + immune signature · inferred · weeks |
| Immune / metabolic | 79 ± 11.4 | +0.29/d | 0.56 | 5 d | Metabolic panel + wearable · inferred · weeks |
| Nutritional sufficiency | 66 ± 8 | +0.07/d | -0.09 | 5 d | Weight, albumin, food log · proxy · days |
| Adherence | 88 ± 5.5 | -0.61/d | 0.82 | 1 d | Dose + to-do completion · direct · today |
| Function / quality of life | 89 ± 5.7 | +0.11/d | 0.29 | 4 d | PRO items · direct · today |
| Glycaemic control | 130 ± 8 | 0/d | 0 | — | CGM daily mean · direct · today |
High autocorrelation and slow recovery are early-warning signatures of a critical transition (Scheffer et al.), independent of the level.
2
Provenance — how did they arrive here?
The path H_0:t: baseline constraints, divergence, perturbations, actions and responses in order.
- day 0baselineBaseline S11: SR phenotype; Normal metabolizer; butyrate 53
- day 13perturbationDaily walks resumed (3.3)
- day 52perturbationDietary drift (-2.6)
- day 59perturbationAntibiotic course (-4.7)
- day 93perturbationLow-HRV stretch (-2.7)
Now: between basins, heading towards restoration.
3
Mechanism — which theories best explain the trajectory?
Versioned competing theories with supporting (E+), contradicting (E−) and missing-but-discriminative (E?) evidence. The contradiction engine lists what should NOT happen under each theory and whether it did.
T1 v1leading
confidence 75%
Mucosal barrier loss: drug-induced epithelial injury amplified by a FUT2-dependent glycan deficit; histamine and inflammatory load add on top.
E+
- DeepGene: Escherichia coli above range (LPS / zonulin)
- DeepGene: tissue recycling 36
E−
- No FUT2 variant
E? · would discriminate
- Faecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility)
- Serum DAO / histamine
- Zonulin
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not improve while histamine intake stays high (GI velocity 0.24/day)
✓ holdsLow-residue meals should reduce GI within a week (not tested)
v1 baseline: genotype + phenotype
T3 v1competing
confidence 15%
Drug-exposure toxicity: pharmacokinetic over-exposure drives GI and systemic toxicity together; dietary and microbial factors are secondary.
E+
- GI autocorrelation 0.67 (slow recovery)
E−
- Normal metabolizer
- Toxicity within range
E? · would discriminate
- Trough drug level
- Dose-timing rechallenge (evening vs morning)
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not move with diet if exposure is the driver (0 dietary detractors with ≥ 80% confidence)
v1 baseline: pharmacogenomics
T2 v2falsified
confidence 5%
Bile-acid diarrhoea on a low-butyrate ecology: reduced SCFA production leaves bile acids unconjugated after fat-rich meals; GI burden tracks fat intake with a one-day lag.
E+
- —
E−
- Butyrate producers intact
- No fat-load signal in the log
E? · would discriminate
- Faecal bile acids
- 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)
- Rechallenge: 3 high-fat days under observation
Forbidden under this theory
✗ violatedGI should not rise on low-fat days (fat effect 0.1 over 40 low-fat days)
v1 baseline: microbiome → v2 dietary attribution
T4 v1competing
confidence 5%
Behavioural spiral: symptomatic days cut adherence and sleep, which raise GI and stress, which cut adherence further; the biology is a follower, not the driver.
E+
- —
E−
- Adherence intact
- Sleep and stress stable
E? · would discriminate
- Dose-taking timestamps vs symptom timestamps
- Sleep-window rechallenge
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not worsen on days with full adherence and good sleep (insufficient paired days)
v1 from tracker trends
4
Forecast — which futures are likely under alternative actions?
30-day rollout of GI burden under the baseline model T and under each safe candidate action (effect ramps over onset). Dashed = prediction, never fact.
No action
GI 13 → 16
8
Intervention as measurement
Each past action as a measurement of this patient's transition dynamics: predicted ΔGI vs observed, prediction error ε_t, and the within-patient evidence patterns → individualized response confidence (observational, kept separate from randomized evidence).
No action started yet.
5
Decision — the Restore controller
Safe set computed first, then A* = argmax E[HealthGain + λ₁·InformationGain + λ₂·ConfidenceGain − λ₃·Risk − λ₄·Burden − λ₅·Cost]. λ₁ = 0.3 (a theory leads), λ₃ = 1 (stable enough). Execution stays with the clinician or the informed patient (EU MDR Class I).
| Class | Action | Health | Info | Conf. | Risk | Burden | Cost | Utility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Observe | Continue passive collection, no perturbation A clean transition can be observed only without a new perturbation. | 0 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.03 |
| Measure | Faecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility) Discriminates T1 from its competitors (E?). | 0 | 0.45 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.2 | 0.01 |
| Maintain | Hold current regimen and content Protects nothing while the state deteriorates. | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0 | 0 |
| Test | Serum DAO / histamine Discriminates T1 from its competitors (E?). | 0 | 0.45 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 0.25 | 0.5 | -0.05 |
Excluded from the safe set
- CR-01 Not indicated for the current state.
- NP-02 Not indicated for the current state.
- AD-05 Not indicated for the current state.
- SC-12 Not indicated for the current state.
- DT-01 Not indicated for the current state.
- HY-01 Not indicated for the current state.
- GI-04 Not indicated for the current state.
- BR-03 Not indicated for the current state.
- ME-01 Not indicated for the current state.
Evidence weights · w = Authority × Relevance × Persistence
- Biological identity Normal metabolizer; CYP2D6, GLP1RGermline panel, baseline0.86 (0.95·0.9·1)
- High-authority clinical Toxicity 9, response 99Labs / imaging, ≤ 14 d0.77 (0.9·1·0.85)
- Intervention response 0 within-patient responses recordedΔS after each action, accumulating0.68 (0.75·1·0.9)
- Deep biological state DeepGene retest day 90: damage 37/100, Shannon 3.17, butyrate 739 CPM, 2 opportunists above, 2 keystone absentSynthetic DeepGene metagenomics + host DNA, sample 938885-R (compositional proxy)0.44 (0.7·1·0.635)
- Dynamic state GI 13, sleep 7.7 h, HRV 43, glucose 130Companion + wearable, today0.18 (0.6·1·0.3)
- Exposure context Keep meals regular; three to four moderate portions spaced through the day; dosing per protocol; adherence 88%Food log + dose log, event-level0.1 (0.55·0.9·0.2)
LLIFE OS insight · the five questions, in prose
grounded · add an LLM key for proseP-02299 is on day 143 of META-24 (SR, baseline S11): response improving, tolerance favorable, GI improving. Over 14 days response moved +15 and GI -13; discontinuation risk is 9%. The state is between basins, heading towards restoration.
Butyrate capacity 53/100, diversity 4.6, normal metabolizer. Pushing it down: Escherichia coli 11.584% (LPS load) (-33.5), Tissue recycling 36/100 (-16.1), Antibiotic course (-4.7). Pulling it up: Protein (supports) (+26.2), Butyrate producers intact (+14.3). From the daily log: protein -6 GI next day.
No action has been tried yet.
No action is indicated now; the trajectory is stable relative to similar patients.