700 patients109,892 observations180 daysLIVE

Human Model · HM(t) at day 170

State-timeSynthetic demo data⟨ I, St, H0:t, Et, Θt, T, Ut ⟩ — belief, not fact; uncertainty shown, not hiddenSteering view
1
Localization — where is this individual biologically now?
Belief state b_t per dimension: value ± sd from within-person noise plus the observation model's semantic distance. Trajectory features (velocity, autocorrelation, recovery time) are state variables.
Dimensionb_tdS/dtautocorrrecoveryobservation model
Therapy response49 ± 8.3+0.47/d0.812 dImaging + tumour markers, interpolated · proxy · last read ≤ 14 d
Gastrointestinal function70 ± 6-0.04/d0.643 dDaily GI check-in · direct · today
Treatment toxicity53 ± 8.3+0.01/d0.351 dLabs, interpolated between draws · proxy · last draw ≤ 7 d
Inflammatory activity65 ± 12.1+0.03/d0.531 dCRP/ferritin + immune signature · inferred · weeks
Immune / metabolic40 ± 11.3+0.26/d0.458 dMetabolic panel + wearable · inferred · weeks
Nutritional sufficiency28 ± 7.9-0.19/d0.291 dWeight, albumin, food log · proxy · days
Adherence38 ± 4.1-0.14/d0.352 dDose + to-do completion · direct · today
Function / quality of life25 ± 5.8+0.47/d0.431 dPRO items · direct · today
Glycaemic control155 ± 80/d0CGM daily mean · direct · today

High autocorrelation and slow recovery are early-warning signatures of a critical transition (Scheffer et al.), independent of the level.

2
Provenance — how did they arrive here?
The path H_0:t: baseline constraints, divergence, perturbations, actions and responses in order.
  1. day 0baselineBaseline S14: EC-03 phenotype; Rapid metabolizer; butyrate 31
  2. day 25divergenceTrajectory diverged from the population model
  3. day 25noteTrajectory diverged from prediction
  4. day 84perturbationAlcohol on dosing days (-1.8)

Now: between basins, heading towards restoration.

3
Mechanism — which theories best explain the trajectory?
Versioned competing theories with supporting (E+), contradicting (E−) and missing-but-discriminative (E?) evidence. The contradiction engine lists what should NOT happen under each theory and whether it did.
T1 v1leading
confidence 39%

Mucosal barrier loss: drug-induced epithelial injury amplified by a FUT2-dependent glycan deficit; histamine and inflammatory load add on top.

E+
  • FUT2 non-secretor genotype (barrier glycan deficit)
  • DeepGene: Escherichia coli above range (LPS / zonulin)
  • DeepGene: host DNA fragmentation atypical
  • DeepGene: tissue recycling 73
  • Inflammatory load 65
E−
E? · would discriminate
  • Faecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility)
  • Serum DAO / histamine
  • Zonulin
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not improve while histamine intake stays high (GI velocity 0.25/day)
✓ holdsLow-residue meals should reduce GI within a week (not tested)
v1 baseline: genotype + phenotype
T2 v2competing
confidence 37%

Bile-acid diarrhoea on a low-butyrate ecology: reduced SCFA production leaves bile acids unconjugated after fat-rich meals; GI burden tracks fat intake with a one-day lag.

E+
  • Butyrate capacity 31/100
  • DeepGene: 7 keystone butyrate producers absent
  • DeepGene: butyrate production 169 CPM
  • Fat load → GI +4.8 next day
  • Diversity 2.5
E−
E? · would discriminate
  • Faecal bile acids
  • 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)
  • Rechallenge: 3 high-fat days under observation
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not rise on low-fat days (fat effect 4.8 over 35 low-fat days)
v1 baseline: microbiome → v2 dietary attribution
T4 v1competing
confidence 15%

Behavioural spiral: symptomatic days cut adherence and sleep, which raise GI and stress, which cut adherence further; the biology is a follower, not the driver.

E+
  • Adherence 38%
  • Stress 6.7/10
E−
E? · would discriminate
  • Dose-taking timestamps vs symptom timestamps
  • Sleep-window rechallenge
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not worsen on days with full adherence and good sleep (insufficient paired days)
v1 from tracker trends
T3 v1falsified
confidence 9%

Drug-exposure toxicity: pharmacokinetic over-exposure drives GI and systemic toxicity together; dietary and microbial factors are secondary.

E+
  • Toxicity 53
  • GI autocorrelation 0.67 (slow recovery)
E−
  • Rapid metabolizer
E? · would discriminate
  • Trough drug level
  • Dose-timing rechallenge (evening vs morning)
Forbidden under this theory
✗ violatedGI should not move with diet if exposure is the driver (5 dietary detractors with ≥ 80% confidence)
v1 baseline: pharmacogenomics
4
Forecast — which futures are likely under alternative actions?
30-day rollout of GI burden under the baseline model T and under each safe candidate action (effect ramps over onset). Dashed = prediction, never fact.
No action
GI 7070
Under GI-04
GI 7053
Under ME-01
GI 7067
Under NP-02
GI 7054
8
Intervention as measurement
Each past action as a measurement of this patient's transition dynamics: predicted ΔGI vs observed, prediction error ε_t, and the within-patient evidence patterns → individualized response confidence (observational, kept separate from randomized evidence).

No action started yet.

5
Decision — the Restore controller
Safe set computed first, then A* = argmax E[HealthGain + λ₁·InformationGain + λ₂·ConfidenceGain − λ₃·Risk − λ₄·Burden − λ₅·Cost]. λ₁ = 0.6 (theories near-equiprobable), λ₃ = 1.4 (fragile state). Execution stays with the clinician or the informed patient (EU MDR Class I).
ClassActionHealthInfoConf.RiskBurdenCostUtility
TreatGI-04 GI Support Protocol
67% of 66 similar improved.
0.580.20.250.130.350.150.39
EscalateCR-01 Clinician Review
100% of 12 similar improved.
0.370.20.250.020.250.150.38
MeasureFaecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility)
Discriminates T1 from its competitors (E?).
00.750.20.020.250.20.32
TreatNP-02 Dietary Support Protocol
64% of 36 similar improved.
0.460.20.250.130.250.150.32
TestSerum DAO / histamine
Discriminates T1 from its competitors (E?).
00.750.20.020.250.50.26
TreatSC-12 Supportive Compound
83% of 23 similar improved.
0.380.20.250.080.250.40.26
TreatHY-01 Hydration Protocol
100% of 2 similar improved.
0.30.20.250.080.250.150.23
EscalateME-01 Monitoring Escalation
100% of 44 similar improved.
0.220.20.250.080.10.150.22
TreatDT-01 Dosing / Timing Recommendation
0% of 1 similar improved.
0.180.20.250.080.250.150.11
ObserveContinue passive collection, no perturbation
A clean transition can be observed only without a new perturbation.
00.150.0500.0500.08
MaintainHold current regimen and content
Protects nothing while the state deteriorates.
0.050.050.050.40.050-0.49
Excluded from the safe set
  • BR-03 Behavioural-only action while toxicity ≥ 55: worst-case trajectory crosses the safety boundary; escalation required first.
  • AD-05 Behavioural-only action while toxicity ≥ 55: worst-case trajectory crosses the safety boundary; escalation required first.
Evidence weights · w = Authority × Relevance × Persistence
  • Biological identity Rapid metabolizer; FUT2, IL6, CYP2D6
    Germline panel, baseline
    0.86 (0.95·0.9·1)
  • High-authority clinical Toxicity 53, response 49
    Labs / imaging, ≤ 14 d
    0.77 (0.9·1·0.85)
  • Intervention response 0 within-patient responses recorded
    ΔS after each action, accumulating
    0.68 (0.75·1·0.9)
  • Deep biological state DeepGene retest day 90: damage 91/100, Shannon 1.34, butyrate 169 CPM, 4 opportunists above, 7 keystone absent
    Synthetic DeepGene metagenomics + host DNA, sample 941580-R (compositional proxy)
    0.35 (0.7·1·0.5)
  • Dynamic state GI 70, sleep 6.4 h, HRV 48, glucose 155
    Companion + wearable, today
    0.18 (0.6·1·0.3)
  • Exposure context Prepare a plain, low-fat pasta or rice meal and note how it feels afterwards; dosing per protocol; adherence 38%
    Food log + dose log, event-level
    0.1 (0.55·0.9·0.2)
LLIFE OS insight · the five questions, in prose
grounded · add an LLM key for prose

P-02537 is on day 170 of META-24 (EC-03, baseline S14): response stable, tolerance deteriorating, GI unstable. Over 14 days response moved +4 and GI -1; discontinuation risk is 96%. The state is between basins, heading towards restoration, after diverging from the model on day 25.

Biology sets the gain: FUT2 non-secretor, IL6 high-expression variant, Low butyrate capacity, Low microbial diversity, Baseline state S14, Cluster EC-03 (high response / high intolerance), Adherence < 60%; butyrate capacity 31/100, diversity 2.5. Pushing it down: Escherichia coli 38.323% (LPS load) (-49.2), Low butyrate capacity (-38.7), 7 keystone species absent (-28.9). Pulling it up: Protein (supports) (+27.7). From the daily log: protein -5.4 GI next day, fat +4.8 GI next day, ultra-processed +4.5 GI next day, simple carbs +4.1 GI next day.

No action has been tried yet.

Next: NP-02 — 57% of 284 similar trajectories improved, 55% probability here. CGM mean 155 mg/dL and stable: dietary support targets the glucose pattern first. This would be contradicted by a further GI rise within the onset window or falling adherence.