Patient P-02313
Synthetic patientMETA-24 · Day 139 · 35–44 · M · baseline S02Steering view · 3DOpen companion preview
Therapy response
Improving
Tolerance
Deteriorating
GI state
Deteriorating
Inflammatory state
Deteriorating
Nutritional resilience
Declining
Discontinuation risk
24%
Trajectory
Baseline → today → 30-day prediction · hover a day for signals and eventssolid = observed · dashed = predicted
- Day 0 META-24 started — Baseline state S02
- Day 10 Trajectory diverged from prediction — Observed response fell below the model's expected path.
- Day 89 CR-01 recommended — Clinician Review CR-01
- Day 90 Patient declined — Not now
What changed?
Trajectory began diverging from predicted response on Day 10.
Primary contributors, last 14 days
- Toxicity+20
- Inflammatory activity+17
- Nutritional resilience-10
- GI instability+4
- Treatment adherence+3
What helped?
- Clinician Review CR-01Day 89Declined by patient
LIFE OS recommendation
No intervention is indicated right now. The trajectory is stable relative to similar patients. See what worked for similar patients.
Daily trackers
Molecule settingsThe trackers this program marks as important, last 14 days vs the 14 before.
Active minutes
Wearable80 min
stable · +0.5 vs previous 14 d
Sleep duration
Wearable6.9 h
stable · -0.2 vs previous 14 d
Energy level
Daily log5.3/10
worsening · -1.2 vs previous 14 d
Steps
Wearable9,748
stable · -25 vs previous 14 d
GI burden
Companion20.5/100
worsening · +7.7 vs previous 14 d
Adherence
Companion93.2 %
stable · -0.6 vs previous 14 d
Sleep quality
Wearable52.4/100
worsening · -6.7 vs previous 14 d
Glucose, CGM daily mean
CGM129 mg/dL
stable · +4.3 vs previous 14 d
This trajectory is decaying — what would help, what would not
Steering view →Heading towards failing · 67 from the failing basin, 25 from restoration.
Would help
- No untried action with strong evidence. Compose one from primitives.
- More proteinGI -5.9 next day on high-intake days · n 20
Would not help
- Nothing clearly counter-productive in the record.
State influencers · digestive
Next-day GI change on high-intake vs low-intake days, last 60 days. Attribution from this patient's own log; sensitivity set by their biology.
- Protein-5.9supporter · 95%
- Ultra-processed food+2.4no signal · 45%
- Dietary fat load+2no signal · 37%
- Insoluble fibre+2no signal · 40%
- Caffeine+1.7no signal · 32%
- Histamine load-0.3no signal · 15%
- Simple carbohydrates+0.3no signal · 15%
- Alcohol+0.3no signal · 15%
Biological layers
Which pathways look influenced, and by which layer of this person's biology.
Pathways under pressure
- Inflammatory signalling ↑20
- MicrobiomeBacteroides fragilis expansion
DNA
Fictional pharmacogenomic panel
- CYP2D6 Intermediate metabolizerExpected exposure
- MTHFR C677TReduced folate turnover
Microbiome
Shannon diversity 3.2 · butyrate capacity 66/100
- Akkermansia muciniphilaNormal
- Faecalibacterium prausnitziiNormal
- Bacteroides fragilisHigh
- Bifidobacterium longumNormal
- EnterobacteriaceaeHigh
Wearable, last 14 days
daily evolution fed into the runtime
- HRV
- 62 ms
- Sleep
- 7.7 h
- Steps
- 8,963
- Resting HR
- 71 bpm
Daily log: GI score 21, nutritional resilience 58, adherence 93.
What this patient sees in NostraAI
The content that steers the trajectory: what to eat, what to do, what to take.
What to eat
- Keep meals regular; three to four moderate portions spaced through the day
- Include a cooked vegetable portion with each main meal
- Keep fibre steady; no new sources this week
- Eat slowly and stop at comfortable fullness — smaller volume, more often
What to do
- Log the daily check-in; one line is enough
- Keep the current walking rhythm
- Keep the sleep window steady
- Keep hydration steady: small amounts through the day rather than large volumes at once
What to take
- Take the dose at the same time relative to your evening meal
- No additional supplements this week
- Fictional demo item: continue vitamin D as before
284 biologically similar trajectories
Black: this patient. Green: similar patients whose intervention worked. Orange: similar patients where it did not.
| Patient | Similarity | Baseline | Intervention | Outcome | Response today |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P-02082 | 45% | S12 | NP-02 | improved | 53 |
| P-02685 | 43% | S16 | DT-01 | improved | 47 |
| P-02462 | 42% | S12 | DT-01 | improved | 65 |
| P-02697 | 42% | S07 | GI-04 | improved | 56 |
| P-02235 | 40% | S14 | DT-01 | improved | 50 |
| P-02645 | 40% | S02 | HY-01 | improved | 56 |
| P-02274 | 39% | S15 | DT-01 | improved | 50 |
| P-02303 | 39% | S15 | GI-04 | improved | 48 |
| P-02218 | 38% | S01 | DT-01 | improved | 61 |
| P-02339 | 38% | S03 | DT-01 | improved | 50 |
| P-02441 | 38% | S11 | SC-12 | improved | 67 |
| P-02484 | 38% | S15 | GI-04 | improved | 49 |