700 patients109,892 observations180 daysLIVE

Human Model · HM(t) at day 160

State-timeSynthetic demo data⟨ I, St, H0:t, Et, Θt, T, Ut ⟩ — belief, not fact; uncertainty shown, not hiddenSteering view
1
Localization — where is this individual biologically now?
Belief state b_t per dimension: value ± sd from within-person noise plus the observation model's semantic distance. Trajectory features (velocity, autocorrelation, recovery time) are state variables.
Dimensionb_tdS/dtautocorrrecoveryobservation model
Therapy response59 ± 7.5-0.01/d0.3615 dImaging + tumour markers, interpolated · proxy · last read ≤ 14 d
Gastrointestinal function53 ± 5.4+0.25/d0.544 dDaily GI check-in · direct · today
Treatment toxicity52 ± 11.6-0.1/d0.87Labs, interpolated between draws · proxy · last draw ≤ 7 d
Inflammatory activity63 ± 11.4+0.18/d0.271 dCRP/ferritin + immune signature · inferred · weeks
Immune / metabolic50 ± 10.7-0.02/d0.154 dMetabolic panel + wearable · inferred · weeks
Nutritional sufficiency39 ± 8.5-0.1/d0.052 dWeight, albumin, food log · proxy · days
Adherence70 ± 6.8-0.77/d0.819 dDose + to-do completion · direct · today
Function / quality of life46 ± 5.5-0.19/d0.591 dPRO items · direct · today
Glycaemic control129 ± 80/d0CGM daily mean · direct · today

High autocorrelation and slow recovery are early-warning signatures of a critical transition (Scheffer et al.), independent of the level.

2
Provenance — how did they arrive here?
The path H_0:t: baseline constraints, divergence, perturbations, actions and responses in order.
  1. day 0baselineBaseline S11: LT phenotype; Rapid metabolizer; butyrate 41
  2. day 22divergenceTrajectory diverged from the population model
  3. day 22noteTrajectory diverged from prediction
  4. day 26perturbationAntibiotic course (-4.7)
  5. day 72perturbationPoor-sleep week (-3)
  6. day 119perturbationDietary drift (-2.6)
  7. day 122recommendedCR-01 recommended
  8. day 123acceptedPatient accepted
  9. day 128responseDeterioration detected before clinical escalation

Now: between basins, heading towards failing.

3
Mechanism — which theories best explain the trajectory?
Versioned competing theories with supporting (E+), contradicting (E−) and missing-but-discriminative (E?) evidence. The contradiction engine lists what should NOT happen under each theory and whether it did.
T2 v2leading
confidence 49%

Bile-acid diarrhoea on a low-butyrate ecology: reduced SCFA production leaves bile acids unconjugated after fat-rich meals; GI burden tracks fat intake with a one-day lag.

E+
  • Butyrate capacity 41/100
  • DeepGene: 4 keystone butyrate producers absent
  • Fat load → GI +5.1 next day
  • Diversity 2.7
E−
E? · would discriminate
  • Faecal bile acids
  • 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)
  • Rechallenge: 3 high-fat days under observation
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not rise on low-fat days (fat effect 5.1 over 39 low-fat days)
v1 baseline: microbiome → v2 dietary attribution
T1 v1competing
confidence 33%

Mucosal barrier loss: drug-induced epithelial injury amplified by a FUT2-dependent glycan deficit; histamine and inflammatory load add on top.

E+
  • DeepGene: host DNA fragmentation atypical
  • DeepGene: tissue recycling 46
  • Inflammatory load 63
E−
  • No FUT2 variant
E? · would discriminate
  • Faecal calprotectin (would separate barrier from motility)
  • Serum DAO / histamine
  • Zonulin
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not improve while histamine intake stays high (GI velocity 0.05/day)
✓ holdsLow-residue meals should reduce GI within a week (not tested)
v1 baseline: genotype + phenotype
T4 v1competing
confidence 15%

Behavioural spiral: symptomatic days cut adherence and sleep, which raise GI and stress, which cut adherence further; the biology is a follower, not the driver.

E+
  • Stress 6.9/10
E−
E? · would discriminate
  • Dose-taking timestamps vs symptom timestamps
  • Sleep-window rechallenge
Forbidden under this theory
✓ holdsGI should not worsen on days with full adherence and good sleep (insufficient paired days)
v1 from tracker trends
T3 v1falsified
confidence 3%

Drug-exposure toxicity: pharmacokinetic over-exposure drives GI and systemic toxicity together; dietary and microbial factors are secondary.

E+
  • Toxicity 52
E−
  • Rapid metabolizer
E? · would discriminate
  • Trough drug level
  • Dose-timing rechallenge (evening vs morning)
Forbidden under this theory
✗ violatedGI should not move with diet if exposure is the driver (4 dietary detractors with ≥ 80% confidence)
v1 baseline: pharmacogenomics
4
Forecast — which futures are likely under alternative actions?
30-day rollout of GI burden under the baseline model T and under each safe candidate action (effect ramps over onset). Dashed = prediction, never fact.
No action
GI 5357
Under GI-04
GI 5343
Under ME-01
GI 5355
Under NP-02
GI 5344
8
Intervention as measurement
Each past action as a measurement of this patient's transition dynamics: predicted ΔGI vs observed, prediction error ε_t, and the within-patient evidence patterns → individualized response confidence (observational, kept separate from randomized evidence).
Actionpred ΔGIobs ΔGIεtemporalitymagnitudedechallengerechallengecross-modalconfidence
CR-01 day 123-72+9n/an/a0%
5
Decision — the Restore controller
Safe set computed first, then A* = argmax E[HealthGain + λ₁·InformationGain + λ₂·ConfidenceGain − λ₃·Risk − λ₄·Burden − λ₅·Cost]. λ₁ = 0.3 (a theory leads), λ₃ = 1 (stable enough). Execution stays with the clinician or the informed patient (EU MDR Class I).
ClassActionHealthInfoConf.RiskBurdenCostUtility
TreatGI-04 GI Support Protocol
68% of 65 similar improved.
0.590.20.250.130.350.150.39
MaintainHold current regimen and content
Protects a favourable trajectory.
0.350.050.050.050.0500.31
TreatNP-02 Dietary Support Protocol
62% of 37 similar improved.
0.450.20.250.130.250.150.3
TreatDT-01 Dosing / Timing Recommendation
100% of 1 similar improved.
0.350.20.250.080.250.150.25
TreatSC-12 Supportive Compound
83% of 24 similar improved.
0.380.20.250.080.250.40.23
EscalateME-01 Monitoring Escalation
100% of 44 similar improved.
0.220.20.250.080.10.150.2
TreatBR-03 Behavioural Recommendation
100% of 2 similar improved.
0.280.20.250.080.250.150.18
TreatHY-01 Hydration Protocol
0% of 1 similar improved.
0.150.20.250.080.250.150.05
ObserveContinue passive collection, no perturbation
A clean transition can be observed only without a new perturbation.
00.150.0500.0500.03
MeasureFaecal bile acids
Discriminates T2 from its competitors (E?).
00.450.20.020.250.20.01
TreatAD-05 Adherence Support
0% of 0 similar improved.
0.10.20.250.080.250.150
Test7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)
Discriminates T2 from its competitors (E?).
00.450.20.020.250.5-0.05
Excluded from the safe set
  • CR-01 Not indicated for the current state.
Evidence weights · w = Authority × Relevance × Persistence
  • Biological identity Rapid metabolizer; IL6, CYP2D6
    Germline panel, baseline
    0.86 (0.95·0.9·1)
  • High-authority clinical Toxicity 52, response 59
    Labs / imaging, ≤ 14 d
    0.77 (0.9·1·0.85)
  • Intervention response 1 within-patient responses recorded
    ΔS after each action, accumulating
    0.68 (0.75·1·0.9)
  • Deep biological state DeepGene retest day 90: damage 68/100, Shannon 2.38, butyrate 570 CPM, 2 opportunists above, 4 keystone absent
    Synthetic DeepGene metagenomics + host DNA, sample 942603-R (compositional proxy)
    0.39 (0.7·1·0.55)
  • Dynamic state GI 53, sleep 7.8 h, HRV 23, glucose 129
    Companion + wearable, today
    0.18 (0.6·1·0.3)
  • Exposure context Prepare a plain, low-fat pasta or rice meal and note how it feels afterwards; dosing per protocol; adherence 70%
    Food log + dose log, event-level
    0.1 (0.55·0.9·0.2)
LLIFE OS insight · the five questions, in prose
grounded · add an LLM key for prose

P-02657 is on day 160 of META-24 (LT, baseline S11): response stable, tolerance improving, GI deteriorating. Over 14 days response moved +3 and GI +5; discontinuation risk is 59%. The state is between basins, heading towards failing, after diverging from the model on day 22.

Biology sets the gain: IL6 high-expression variant, Low microbial diversity; butyrate capacity 41/100, diversity 2.7. Pushing it down: Low butyrate capacity (-36.8), 4 keystone species absent (-27.5), Ultra-processed food (-25.7). Pulling it up: Protein (supports) (+27.7). From the daily log: ultra-processed +5.8 GI next day, protein -5.5 GI next day, fat +5.1 GI next day, simple carbs +5.1 GI next day.

Past actions: CR-01 on day 123 → improved (8%).

Next: GI-04 — 90% of 284 similar trajectories improved, 59% probability here. This would be contradicted by a further GI rise within the onset window or falling adherence.